I love these jeans! I had wanted them for awhile, and decided to finally get them. The price is not bad at all considering the cost of most other premium brands. I loved the "moto" look of these...
Diesel jogg jeans are not exactly what Diesel tries to sell them as. Diesel tries to sell them as sweat pants that look like denim. The fact is they are denim that are soft like sweatpants....
Diesel really out did themselves this time. The Braddom is a regular straight leg fit that tapers down to a slimmer opening. The fit is very comfortable and the tapering really makes them...
These jeans are the best. 7 for all mankind makes the best jeans with the best materials. It doesn't feel like you are wearing jeans at all. They are so comfortable and they make your butt look...
Ok I am really confused here, this IS the WAYWT thread isn’t it? What the fuck is all this talk of the mall doing here? I do realize that here on HF, thread tend to move in the most ambiguous directions, but if we are all going to bitch about something, could it at least be in a separate thread so that its exposure is not limited to those who read the WAYWT?
I think +/- is only worth keeping if you can see who is doing it.
I disagree with this only because I think people are more likely to be "honest" about their opinions when the +/- is done anonymously.
If it weren't anonymous, I don't think people would be as willing to neg something...
Of course, you could say they could just comment about why they don't like something, but I think anonymous +/- will get more accurate results about how the users in general feel about someone's outfit.
I disagree with this only because I think people are more likely to be "honest" about their opinions when the +/- is done anonymously.
If it weren't anonymous, I don't think people would be as willing to neg something...
Of course, you could say they could just comment about why they don't like something, but I think anonymous +/- will get more accurate results about how the users in general feel about someone's outfit.
Anyone only able to share their opinion under a shroud of secrecy doesn't deserve to have their opinion heard in the first place.
^gotta agree with this in a way. although i personally don't care who negs me (though i am curious to see who the people are who neg everything i post automatically) nor do i care if anyone sees that i negged them, others definitely can take offense to things like that and cause more trouble than its worth. as far as my own posts go, i tend to just look at the total number of votes rather than the net result because i find negging to be the most sincere form of flattery
If this is true... if THIS is true... if thiiiiiis is truuuuuuuuuue...
Since you still knew which forum poster took issue with which worthless posts, no. People can post 8,000 pictures of themselves and "neg" random posts without informing anyone, meaning that they are still under a shroud of secrecy. Think, please!
P.S. Do you honestly think that I support democracy?
I don't see how secrecy matters... opinions only matter if you let them.
So maybe if you like someone's style, you will appreciate his/her opinion more because they have qualified it? I would agree with that.
I'm not saying that the opinions of HF users as a whole are sound or valid, just that anonymous voting will result in more people voting, and thus will result in a more representative sample of HF users' opinions as a whole. Take away anonymous voting, and I guarantee you that there will be less voting, and definitely less negging.
If voting weren't anonymous, people won't neg as much on outfits that they dislike.
There will be less negging because people will no longer throw out senseless negatives unless there's an actual reason to do so. You'd be a fool to think that some rather decent outfits in this thread don't receive unjust negs solely because certain individuals now have the ability to click a little red button without anyone knowing who exactly did so. People are inherently afraid of being "called out" on what could be viewed as cowardly negs, so they'll make sure to have a truly sensible reason for negging a post before doing so.
I do not want to lose the ability to see who negs my posts solely because some people who senselessly neg will no longer have the balls to do so; either grow some thicker skin and be willing to stand by your opinion or don't click a button in the first place.
umm so with the two threads is cross posting bad? i don't really like this idea.. or maybe i just dont understand it. anyways heres what i wore to my friends bday party dinner:
^dorky bathroom pic sorry
Diesel Lowky 8AX
Random top
Vickkkayyy, you look lovely! But i must say, in your avatar you look like you wanna kick my ass... hehehe thankyou for posting and prettifying up this thread.. xo
1) You're indeed a good girl. As good as gold...
2) You come from a good home. So, your parents keep you on a short leash...
3) You're a good liar, because actually you're not as half as innocent as you assert...
"The third option is the charm", or something like that...