Quote:
Originally Posted by ryan24 
the ones that I had already bought had only two small pictures of a small portion of the jeans. i just wanted a 2nd opinion.
I've owned over 1000 pairs of authentic diesels over the past 5 years so i'm pretty sure I know what I'm talking about atleast 95% of the time. There are some newer washes and things that went only to europe that I've never seen before so thats why i post things in here from time to time.
Im pretty sure i'm qualified to say that a pair that i can easily tell is real, is authentic.
|
Sorry Ryan, disqualified again. Having not seen a particular wash is not an excuse for not being able to tell wether it is authentic or not (it is different with cuts though). And regarding the pair you
bought: those little pics were more than enough to tell how fake they are. I am quiet astonished that you cant tell real from fake after having owned 1000 "authentic" Diesels. Should we do some authentication on them?
I never took a closer inspection of a pair of Viker 8EBs, nonetheless I am able to tell that the pair in question is fake.
1. The material looks cheesy, nothing that can be accounted for by wash and wear. One of the most important points. Diesel denim quality is high, a pair that looks like poor quality most likely is fake.
2. The cut itself looks off, Darnoc made it pretty clear now. Biodiesel gave the first hint, you still didnt notice. Btw. that was the thing that made it certain for me that they are fake.
I admit though, that there are a lot of details present on that pair. It is of higher quality, in particular regarding wash/whiskers, than the average Zathan 772 fake that even Joe Average can tell that its fake. But it is still far from being missed with a real one.