or Connect
DenimBlog.com › Welcome to the DenimBlog Community! › Mens Designer Jeans  › Diesel Jeans › X Rotuck vs Zathan (my view in terms of cutting)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

X Rotuck vs Zathan (my view in terms of cutting)

post #1 of 8
Thread Starter 
i wear Zathan W31, although i can wear W30 too but i prefer W31 because it gives more of a "flared" look to my pants. having a slighly higher waist also makes it slightly more comfortable, although you give up the fact that your butt may not look as dazzling as it should. everything is in margins though cause W30 and W31 are obviously very close in sizing.

i decided to get X Rotucks 31s, and i must say i did the right choice. compared to zathans, the thighs are a little more tighter than the zathans. the jeans are even lower waist (which i love) although some may relate that to being more girl like. the flare is absolutely beautiful...its not hippi like but it gives (short) people like me more structure and form to my overall appearance. the butt on the x rotucks fit ALOT better though, much more perfectly cut for people with small butts like me =P if you have a medium to large one...it may feel awkward though i can imagine.

because of the flare, i think X rotucks will be alot easier to fix the bottoms too if they are too long, because you would only lose a little flare, so slight you probably wont even notice and worst case scenario they would come out to be similar to zathans which are fine.

anyways x rotucks are my favorite jeans now! only the 82L clerby is in equal in terms of cutting. absolutely amazing cut!
post #2 of 8
i'm in the process of getting all my bootcut jeans taken in on the bottoms so they are straight legs. i figure the zaf's will look a little strang but who cares. it's better than not wearing them.
post #3 of 8
I recently purchased a pair of X-Rotucks in 29x30, and the fit is very close to my 28 Zathans.
post #4 of 8
Thread Starter 
yep i agree with ya race, thats how i felt in terms of the sizing too.

bleh circa, i cant stand straight legg =p
post #5 of 8
give me farcos or give me death.
post #6 of 8
yeah i should of got a size 33 waist in x rotucks though in zathan 772 i am a 32. the legs on the zathans "broke in" for me lovely. the X-rotuck 796 are scaring me that maybe they won't "break in" as good. also the ass is super tight on the x rotucks as compared to the zathans.
i wore my x rotucks all night last nite with some friends, mostly girls, and i could see that they were looking at how tight they were. though usually they bust on me for my choice in cut of jeans. maybe they are getting used to it by now.

anyway, will the 796 x rotucks break in good for me. i am sure they will but you i'm sure have better experience?

bern
post #7 of 8
Before, I got into diesel I never knew to much about boot/flar cut jeans. Now thats all I wear and will continue to wear!
post #8 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devil33
Before, I got into diesel I never knew to much about boot/flar cut jeans. Now thats all I wear and will continue to wear!
yeah me too!! as "straight" as i get is YOKEES
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Diesel Jeans
DenimBlog.com › Welcome to the DenimBlog Community! › Mens Designer Jeans  › Diesel Jeans › X Rotuck vs Zathan (my view in terms of cutting)