or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

764 wash

post #1 of 12
Thread Starter 
hi guys, i was just wondering if this is what the 764 wash really looks like?? it looks different in italian depots pics but i really like the look of this.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...sPageName=WDVW
post #2 of 12
This seller and this item was discussed here: http://www.honestforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=1245

It is hard to make the comparison because many of italiandepot's pictures are just poorly taken and unclear. Good luck.
post #3 of 12
Gross, they look like you just came out of the sandbox. Not my style.
post #4 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by diesel_dreamz
Gross, they look like you just came out of the sandbox. Not my style.
The ones I've seen in the store also have this kind of rusty dirt, to varying degrees. The zathans have less than the kuratts and sanons from what I've seen, but there's a LOT of wash variation in the 764s. Its REALLY obvious if you take a pair and look at the inside pockets which are made of white fabric. It actually looks like someone lost control of their bowels in there. But looks cool from the outside hehe.

Anyways the color in those pictures may just be due to an overactive flash on the camera used when they were taken.
post #5 of 12
it's a cool wash. the dirt washes out. i got 30 x 32 zathan 764 that havent been worn for sale. PM me. got some M diesel shirts unworn too with pics. 4 of them to be exact. PM me!.
post #6 of 12
i got mine from the diesel store in king of prussia pa and they aren't that "dirty"
post #7 of 12
I've never seen 764s in the store that look that dirty. that seems somewhat off-wash. most of the dirt is located near the waistband, is more even in distribution than in those pictures.
post #8 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by gospastic
I've never seen 764s in the store that look that dirty. that seems somewhat off-wash. most of the dirt is located near the waistband, is more even in distribution than in those pictures.
Like I said, it may have been the camera. Using a polarizer and a TON of light he could have increased the contrast of that image which would make the dirt appear much more vivid than it actually is:

http://www.cs.mtu.edu/~shene/DigiCam...polarizer.html
post #9 of 12
I would receommend the pics from this auction:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...sPageName=WD1V

He's no "Dieselofmiami", but hey not everyone is "perfect"
post #10 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZATHANSRULE
I would receommend the pics from this auction:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...sPageName=WD1V

He's no "Dieselofmiami", but hey not everyone is "perfect"
Yeah thats the canadian guy who knows what he's doing around a camera. I remember noting that his pix of the zathan T60 were particularly nice, when he had some of those.
post #11 of 12
those kuratts look awful and appear to be EXTREMELY offwash. sorry blm but i don't think his camera could do those any justice. the 764's that i've seen are pretty dark and they look like they have actual dirt all over the thighs. those look like they were dragged through dogcrap but ended up missing a few spots. i'd suggest finding a different pair that's not as ridiculously offwash as those. but that's just me.
post #12 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetsetter
those kuratts look awful and appear to be EXTREMELY offwash. sorry blm but i don't think his camera could do those any justice. the 764's that i've seen are pretty dark and they look like they have actual dirt all over the thighs. those look like they were dragged through dogcrap but ended up missing a few spots. i'd suggest finding a different pair that's not as ridiculously offwash as those. but that's just me.
Like I said, hard to say. I promise you that that look could be entirely due to camera and lighting, but of course you should always only bid on what you're comfortable with.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Diesel Jeans