New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Darron 887Q size

post #1 of 12
3/19/13 at 4:31pm
Thread Starter 

Hi,

I am looking to buy a pair of Darron 887Q and I am wondering how its size compare 

to shioner/ tepphar ? Is the denim stiff or soft?

I am usually a size 30 in both shioner and tepphar. I am wondering what size should I get for the Darron

Thanks in advance!!!

Reply
post #2 of 12
3/19/13 at 4:43pm

Have you seen these for sale anywhere? I'm looking for a pair myself. 

Reply
post #3 of 12
3/20/13 at 12:19am
Thread Starter 

Ya,

the thing is they only have 29/30. Its on ebay. Wondering if I can fit in that size

Reply
post #4 of 12
3/20/13 at 1:52am

I was also looking at that pair. The seller told me that they measure 16.5 inches (waist aligned). I was kind of hopeful but I have recently tried a Tepphar in a 29 and it was a no go. From looking at the Krooley in my local store, I think the denim on the 887Q is not too stiff.

Reply
post #5 of 12
3/20/13 at 11:20am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by leftvapor View Post

I was also looking at that pair. The seller told me that they measure 16.5 inches (waist aligned). I was kind of hopeful but I have recently tried a Tepphar in a 29 and it was a no go. From looking at the Krooley in my local store, I think the denim on the 887Q is not too stiff.

So the waist is too tight for you in tepphar in a 29?? because I have space is the waist for tepphar in a 30 but from the calf down its just right.

I was hoping to get the krooley 8x9 but way to expesive and found this Darron on ebay

Reply
post #6 of 12
3/20/13 at 2:58pm

I couldnt comment for all Tepphar, but certainly in the 886A wash, they were too tight all over; thighs, calves, and couldnt get the waist done up. Sorry I cant be of any more help.

Reply
post #7 of 12
3/20/13 at 4:19pm

I own 887Q in Krooley and it's stiffer than 8Y3 and as stiff as 801N, IMO.

Reply
post #8 of 12
3/20/13 at 4:23pm

BTW I like 887Q much better than 8x9, which everyone seems to love but I always thought is fugly with all those random holes.

Reply
post #9 of 12
3/20/13 at 8:09pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by leftvapor View Post

I couldnt comment for all Tepphar, but certainly in the 886A wash, they were too tight all over; thighs, calves, and couldnt get the waist done up. Sorry I cant be of any more help.

Thanks man, I think maybe I will go on and try on some of the tepphars and darrons in 29

Reply
post #10 of 12
3/20/13 at 8:12pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeyPunch View Post

BTW I like 887Q much better than 8x9, which everyone seems to love but I always thought is fugly with all those random holes.

I havent seen the 8x9 or 887Q in person but from the picture 8x9 looks so much cooler. Don't know how it fairs in person

Reply
post #11 of 12
3/20/13 at 11:01pm

Nooo waaay! 8X9 is unbeatable!:D
 

Reply
post #12 of 12
3/21/13 at 7:31am

8x9 is awesome 887q is too boring for my tastes.

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Diesel Jeans