or Connect
DenimBlog.com › Welcome to the DenimBlog Community! › General Topics › Chat › Back-pocket-less Jeans... on a man.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Back-pocket-less Jeans... on a man.

post #1 of 43
Thread Starter 
So, I have a pair of Daze's... Don't remember how I got them... Failed to sell them... Wore them today... I don't know... They're alright. But back-pocket-less jeans, on a guy... What do you all think? I was a bit leery at first... but they're growing on me... Kinda weird to reach to put my wallet back there, only to remember I don't have a pocket there... and wonder how stupid I look reaching for my ass...
post #2 of 43
only an ass photo will tell.
post #3 of 43
back pocketless jeans just look plain trashy on girls even.

stay away. stay far away.
post #4 of 43
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewaaron
back pocketless jeans just look plain trashy on girls even.

stay away. stay far away.
Pourquoi? What's so bad about it?
post #5 of 43
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by csirip
only an ass photo will tell.
Perhaps... They're 28 though... and a bit big.
post #6 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewaaron
back pocketless jeans just look plain trashy on girls even.

stay away. stay far away.
basically what my initial response was going to be.

but i was just trying to score an ass picture. whatever
post #7 of 43
I'd stay away from that as well.
post #8 of 43
I'd LOL @ you if I saw u walking on the streets wearing jeans without backpockets, it just looks rediculous on a man, it could look kinda secksy on a girl with a nice ass though
post #9 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by n32getfunky
...it could look kinda secksy on a girl with a nice ass though
Yeah, I agree. However, I swear it's always the chunky chola girls that wear backpocketless jeans. Super trashy.
post #10 of 43
I basically second what everyone else said... back-pocketless jeans should be banned
post #11 of 43
I think they look really hot on women
post #12 of 43
I have to say that missing back pockets...on a guy...sounds kinda crappy. I dont like them on girls much either unless they have some humps
post #13 of 43
DONT DO IT> BAD IDEA.
post #14 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by blm14
I think they look really hot on women
Oh my god I hope you're not serious.

They're so trashy looking on girls. God, they're generally cheap-looking (the jeans, I mean) and just...ughhh...I ABSOLUTELY CANNOT STAND THEM! THEY ARE LIKE THE WORST PET PEEVE TO ME EVER! They're just sooo ugly. I don't see how people can think that they actually LOOK GOOD in them.

And, sorry Mgras, if I every saw back-pocket-less jeans on a guy, I think I would vomit/keel over and die in the street laughing.

That's just my (very) strong opinion.
post #15 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by blm14
I think they look really hot on women
mabye because there is no pockets, it makes the butt look bigger..

I personally don't like them....
post #16 of 43
it look hot on both sexes
post #17 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by blm14
I think they look really hot on women
Yep I'm with ya on that one, I remember making my ex get a few pairs when they first came out hhhhmmmm, if you have a nice ass, it makes it look fantastic.
post #18 of 43
oh my god forcing women to buy backpocket-less jeans is sick and wrong.
post #19 of 43
i think the blue cult gwen jeans are pretty cute.
post #20 of 43
Yeah, not a fan of pocketless jeans on myself or females. I've seen girls wearing denim (not sure if they qualified as jeans) with no back pockets and front sew on pockets, oh the humanity....
post #21 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by bombon99
mabye because there is no pockets, it makes the butt look bigger..

I personally don't like them....
I've actually read that too . . . and by the way, I don't like them either.
post #22 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by ally24k
i think the blue cult gwen jeans are pretty cute.
no! my mom tried to force me to buy a pair (oh, god no!), but I'm sorry, even if they are blue cults, there is no excuse for high-end jeans to make such ugly, cheap-trash-looking, unflattering styles. Personally, I find no excuse for wearing jeans without back pockets. Not a one. Even if your poor, tell me, and I'd rather give you the extra 3 bucks to get you a nicer pair of jeans with back pockets at Ross than be subjected to a pocketless butt!
post #23 of 43
backpocket-less jeans...i think it depends on how good your butt looks! i have a pair of jeans without backpockets and they look nice/clean on me. i agree if you have a huge butt you shouldn't wear jeans without back pockets on them since it'll make your butt look even bigger, but otherwise it's fine. i would love to get a pair of the r&r scorpions or maybe the blue cult gwyneths.

i don't think i've ever seen backpocket-less jeans on guys but if you have a nice behind i'm sure you can pull it off.
post #24 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgoose
hhhhmmmm, if you have a nice ass, it makes it look fantastic.
i agree with you!
post #25 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by missmk
oh my god forcing women to buy backpocket-less jeans is sick and wrong.
having to force a girl with a nice ass to buy them is wrong.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Chat
DenimBlog.com › Welcome to the DenimBlog Community! › General Topics › Chat › Back-pocket-less Jeans... on a man.