If you're making a mild Slammer pair, make 73H the mild pair - give it plain pockets.
73J has crazy holes and distressing, but plain pockets. 73H is a plain wash with wild pockets. Does anyone else think this is stupid? I would buy 73H in a heartbeat if it only had 73J's backpockets, but now I'm not going to buy either. It just seems kind of redundant.
I didn't find any non stock pics, so here are some shots of my new Slammers from Yoox. (not worn yet). Btw. they are around 2 cm smaller in waist than the same sized Slammer 73J (kinda snugg, hope they will stretch some), but the rest is same sized (thight, knee etc.). Btw. I love them
Pics taken without flash, sorry for the blue desk (jeans loose some of contrast :-/)
Nice fit man. I like the length. You def can pull off slammer well. Perhaps just sagging a little bit to eliminate some of the crotch-bulging-up-awkwardness would be a good idea. Its not too bad in the pics tho
OK, after one day of wear the zip slider on left backpocket is broken. What's wrong Diesel, there was no problem on older washes with the zippers. It's also seems to be cheaper version of the slider than on my 71J e.g. (pics). I already asked yoox if this could be applied as reason for return.