Quote:
Originally Posted by vonWitzleben 
Sounds sound, but its missing logic:
|
Correction, you are missing logic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vonWitzleben 
You can get your feet covered for 20$ but you pay several hundreds (or even thousands) for shoes?
|
Yes, I spend good money to buy high quality shoes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vonWitzleben 
Why do you think that ALL better shoe-manufacturers produce shoes with leather soles? Because they are inferior to rubber soles? To be able to charge for resoleing? To have people spend extra money on additional rubber soles?
|
Because leather soles are easy to replace via relasting, and traditionally, were a relatively durable material.
I've never once said that leather soles are inferior to rubber soles. I actually prefer leather soles myself. There are 3 reasons why I have a rubber 'topy' put on my shoes. They
INCREASE THE LONGEVITY of your soles allowing you to avoid a costly relasting of your shoes,
PROTECT your shoes from moisture (rain or snow) soaking up through the permeable leather sole, and
GRIP the ground better than leather soles.
Also, the 'topy' soles can be removed and replaced with new ones by your cobbler once they start to wear down. But, even if they couldn't be replaced, the math still makes sense to have these put on. The rubber wears much slower than leather and you certainly could not get your shoes relasted for the price of putting the rubber on top of the leather soles. Plus, at the end of the day, the leather soles can be relasted with fresh leather soles, so who cares?
Quote:
Originally Posted by vonWitzleben 
You seem to know not only a lot about fashion but also about shoes and the associated craftsmanship. You should know better than that.
|
You should do some research before trying to lecture someone with that condescending tone of yours. You should know better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vonWitzleben 
The leather is treated (tanned) in a way it gets hydrophobic. You can treat the soles with special oils/tonics to ensure the effect is longlasting.
|
Sure, the leather is treated, but the bottom line is that leather is a permeable material, and water is a universal solvent. Water will get through the bottom of your soles eventually.
If you don't believe me, go do a test for me. Fill your bath tub with about 1cm of water and put a pair of shoes in there (preferably one of your nice ones so I can laugh when they soaked) and let their 'hydrophobic' soles sit in the water for a few hours. Let me know what happens.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vonWitzleben 
In case you didnt know: After a day of wear, a full leather shoe should rest a full day unworn to be able to get rid of humidity. The bit of water in the outmost layer of the sole, vanishes in the same time as well.
|
Thanks for the shoe care 101 lesson. That would be why I own numerous pairs of shoes and store them with cedar shoe trees in between wears. No amount of 'rest' days can undo the damage that water can potentially do to your shoes in just 1 day.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vonWitzleben 
My Chukka boots are almost two years old and I wore them in rain and snow as well. The soles are fine and still have years of wear in them before I have to resole them. Only thing with snow is that leather soles have less grip.
|
Good for you. Would you like a cookie? I don't consider 2 years to be that long in the grand scheme of things for a nice pair of shoes. Many of the shoes I have, I am planning on keeping for a lifetime.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vonWitzleben 
I really dont understand why you guys spent so much money on shoes, having (in most cases) high quality materials and then have someone glue some plastic on top of the quality material...
|
First off, 'topy' soles are made of rubber, not plastic. Second, you probably never will. I'm not going to try to explain myself any more because I think I've made the advantages sufficiently clear here and it seems like convincing you otherwise is a lost cause.