I am not trying to be rude, nasty or unfair. But not for nothing I sell a lot of denim and a lot of expensive denim that is more, much more expensive then R & R and the only issues that I have is with you girls from the forum. I apologize that Hilary received the jeans that she thought will be something else, but I disclosed everything about the jeans distressing as well as tag missing and pictures.
Just for the record I run a business and not only on Ebay so I do not have the time or the desire to crystallize the crowns. R & R is just a small part of my business. I simply would not have enough hours in the day to list all of my merchandise that I have in my warehouse. My business is to sell jeans not crystallize them. So there is no need for assumptions and accusations. My day is way too busy to deal with crystals, their colors, and placing them on the pockets. This is how I got the jeans from a boutique in NYC as a sample and I disclosed that. Maybe you can call them up and ask them where they got the jeans.
To Hilary's comment:
"Additionally, there is a lot more distressing on the pair I purchased than on the pair that I own (the new pair is amost completely threadbare on one of the pockets), and I feel they would probably fall apart after one wash or wear, although I did not mention this in my correspondence with the seller."
First of all I have both of the letters that you sent to me and you mentioned absolutely nothing about heavy distressing. Second I have many jeans some are more distressed then others. That does not mean anything. The reason you did not mention this because I disclosed that in the ad along with pictures and a close up picture of the heavy distressed pocket. So the above comment is absolutely unnecessary, you have seen the pictures, you read the ad, you were aware of the heavy distressing and if you thought that they will fall apart because of that you shouldn't of purchased them. This comment was completely totally unnecessary.
Just for the record I do not buy my jeans at Century 21. Don't assume. Because one pair previously came from there. Like I said I run a business not a kiddie games. I work with major buyers from Saks, Neimun, and other high end department stores and boutiques in NYC. Because of our relationship they order my merchandise from their vendors, since I am not a wholesaler and do not have a license or access to those vendors. I do not only carry R & R jeans, its a fraction of my business. So there is no need to make accusations.
Also like some people here assume I got stuck with the jeans.... Lat week i had 109 pairs posted this week 40 so what does that say...... Thats really funny. I can get rid of them quickly, I did not get stuck with them. Also I could of taken the jeans back and give her a refund. Everyone here thinks apparently that paypal always takes buyers side. However it is very very untrue. There was another person from the forum who claimed that the crown was off centered and everyone in this forum practically sworn up and down that she will get her money back from paypal for significantly not as described. But that did not happened. Unfortunately she was waiting for 45 days to get her money and she didn't. Because by paypal rules it did not constitute significantly not as described. All the buyers assume they can get away with that and that's why everyone here posted to her that she will definitely get her money back and that she should definitely go through paypal. She took all of your advise and got nothing. I am not trying to be nasty or anything, but this crap with significantly not as described does not always work in buyers favor.
I AM A MAN AND I AM A BUSINESS MAN. HONESTLY I WOULD NOT WANT HILARY TO WAIT 45 DAYS TO GET NOTHING LIKE THE OTHER PERSON DID. I WILL BE A MAN AND TAKE THE JEANS BACK FROM YOU HILARY. FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME.