Quote:
Originally Posted by kellygawtscammed 
So if you ever lose your job and cant find a new one right away but have kids to feed, what would you do?
Serious, honest question.
|
My question was not on government assistance. It was on people we allow in and then they become a burden on the system.
Quote:
Originally Posted by trampzilla 
If all the people cared about was whether something is an economic burden or not then why have charity or help out someone less fortunate altogether?
|
So the first world countries should allow the two billion who live on dollars a day into their countries?
Quote:
Originally Posted by trampzilla 
Not to mention that many industrialised countries first imposed a burden on third world countries and are now somewhat performing a payback to balance things out. Some countries (US included) are providing certain assistance as a form of making up for abuse done in the past.
|
What are you talking about? This has absolutely nothing to do with my question but I'll respond to it anyway.
Do you think Europeans automatically were given first world industrialized societies? No, they were intelligent and gave the world electricity, cars, computers, medicine, modern technology, etc. If anything, the third world owes us.
How did the first world "impose a burden on third world countries?" Such a broad and moronic statement. By giving them written languages, electricity, medicine, that's a burden?
The question is:
Should the United States allow people to come in and leech off of the system when we have millions of of our own poor? Then again, I always see some welfare mom with her 3 kids from 3 different dads with her $300 cellphone pull out a EBT card.