DenimBlog.com
  • Blog
  • Community
  • DenimBlog.com - Home
  • Celebs in Jeans
  • Denim DIY
  • Denim Reviews
  • Interviews
  • Look Books
DenimBlog.com  ›  Blog  ›  Jesus Jeans deemed ‘Morally Offensive’



  • Join DenimBlog on Facebook
  • Follow @DenimBlog on Twitter
  • RSS Blog feed
  • Need help? Check out the FAQ's
  • Submit Pictures and News
  • Show your DenimBlog Pride | Get Code
  • Brands
  • Celebs

Designer Jeans Brands

  • Diesel
    Jeans
  • Seven
    Jeans
  • J Brand
  • Paige Denim
  • Current / Elliott
  • Siwy
  • Levi's
  • AG Jeans
  • DL1961
  • James Jeans
  • Joe's
  • True Religion Jeans
  • Rag & Bone
  • Citizens of Humanity
  • Hudson Jeans
  • Lucky Brand

Celebrities in Designer Jeans

  • Ashley
    Tisdale
  • Vanessa
    Hudgens
  • Zac
    Efron
  • Lindsay
    Lohan
  • Victoria
    Beckham
  • David
    Beckham
  • Jessica
    Alba
  • Megan
    Fox
  • Hayden
    Panettiere
  • Miley
    Cyrus
  • Rachel
    Bilson
  • Ashley
    Greene
  • Jennifer
    Aniston
  • Britney
    Spears
  • Christina
    Aguilera
  • Halle
    Berry
  • Kim
    Kardashian
  • Rihanna
  • Nicole Richie
  • Kate Moss
  • Gwen Stefani
  • Elle
    MacPherson

  • Featured Posts
  • All Time
  • New Distressed Jeans by Rag & Bone for Men
  • DenimBlog Exclusive: Interview with Nikki Reed for 7 For All Mankind
  • J Brand Autumn/Winter 2013 Men’s Press Day
  • 3 Pairs, 3 Looks, 1 Brand: Frame Denim
  • J Brand Autumn/Winter 2013 Women’s Press Day
  • Acid Wash Jeans
  • 3 Ways to Wear the Simon Miller Stinson Jeans
  • Nudie Autumn/Winter 2013 Press Day
  • 8 of our Biggest and Best Discussions from the DenimBlog Community
  • 6 Essential Fashion Websites You Should Be Reading
  • How To Stretch Jeans
  • 6 Awesome NYC Fashion Bloggers
  • 5 LA Fashion Bloggers You Should Know
  • Top 5 Denim Guys
  • Top 10 Denim Diva’s of 2011
  • Your Favourite Celeb Outfit Of 2011!





RSS DenimBlog Community

  • PLEASE AUTHENTICATE THESE JEANS
  • MEN'S DIESEL THAVAR ART 886B 86B SLIM SKINNY JEANS SIZE 27
  • MEN'S DIESEL BLACK GOLD CRAVE LIMITED EDITION JAPANESE SELVAGE JEANS 26
  • GIORGIO ARMANI NAVY HAND TAILORED SUIT 40 REGULAR 40R 50R
  • Diesel Krooley 801N 30X34 almost new!
  • SUPER EXTRA RARE THANAZ 8SV 29X34 (100 CM)
  • what's the "professional" way to reduce jean's waist?
  • Marc by Marc Jacobs Black Metal Check Groovee HARD TO FIND! $598
  • Raw Denim
  • REPLAY Trousers Brand New Without Tags.

We would like to thank the following sponsors who support us in bringing you all the celebrity denim news you love.
Advertisement

Jesus Jeans deemed ‘Morally Offensive’

01.15.2009 Posted in What were they thinking?! by Jessie
« Celebs in Denim: Kate Beckinsale in Genetic Denim XY!
Jean Styles You Should Try At Least Once in Your Lifetime »

 

125 19 zoom Jesus Jeans deemed Morally Offensive

In 1973, Italian Jesus Jeans ad with the line “he who loves me follows me”….

jesusjeans Jesus Jeans deemed Morally Offensive
As well as the UK, it has been rejected in Germany, Switzerland, China, Hungary and Ireland.

The Patent Office registrar said the name would cause greater offence than mere distaste to a significant section of the general public, based on the view of a “right thinking member of the public”.

He said the name was was “contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality”.

However, in 1997 the Patent Office approved French Connection’s application to register FCUK as a brand.

In the case of Jesus Jeans, the Patent Office argued that the name Jesus would be “debased” if it were used to sell jeans and other products offered by the company such as soap, scent and shoes.

The ruling said the value of the name lay in the belief of Christians that Jesus is the Son of God, and although other religions were practised in the UK, most British people would associated only this meaning to the word.

The company that owns the brand, Basic Trademark, argued that the name Jesus is a popular name and that there was a difference between offence that amounted to distaste, and that of offence that would cause outrage or attract censure by undermining religious values.

Lawyers acting for Basic Trademark, WH Beck Greener & Co, told The Times: “Moral grounds should only be raised where there is a question of public order. The use of the word ‘Jesus’ as a mark is not likely to inflame public disorder.” 

The brand has successfully registered the name Jesus in Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Austria, France, Italy, and Spain, but its rejection in the UK is not the first.

source

Related Posts


  1. Hot new denim lines from 18th Amendment jeans, DVB jeans, and Aristocrat Jeans

  2. High waisted jeans = Mom jeans?!

  3. Ten best jeans under $100


  1. Find jeans that FIT!

  2. Deal of the Day – Joe’s Jeans
  3. Mom Jeans : SNL video

  • Tweet

Comments

13 Responses to “Jesus Jeans deemed ‘Morally Offensive’”

  1. guest2634 says:
    January 15, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    Like they would sell any of those anyways?

  2. MizzJ says:
    January 15, 2009 at 3:48 pm

    Maybe they could argue that Jesus is just a name, but when they use ads with taglines like those, then there is no question who they are talking about. I’m not religious myself, but I wouldn’t go around purposely disrespecting others’ beliefs.

  3. greenfairie says:
    January 15, 2009 at 10:13 pm

    Yeah, it’s the Spanish name Jesus, not THAT Jesus ;) . Surrre.

    This brand has been around a long time and based on those ads, they are skeevy. If I were the Lord, I wouldn’t be bothered as much by taking my name in vain as I would be by the fact the jeans and the ads are REALLY tacky.

  4. jessie says:
    January 15, 2009 at 11:33 pm

    Greenfairie got jokes today!! Funny fairie that one!! LOL

    These ads are older than me! I was shocked that this was a current lawsuit, LOL.

  5. Prayes says:
    January 16, 2009 at 9:29 am

    You mean “Thou shalt not have any other jeans but me”, signed, JESUS jeans, doesn’t sell it for you??

    Come on, you have to admit that is kind of funny, in a ‘I don’t think I could think of something that lame if I tried’ kind of way.

  6. spiritman says:
    May 22, 2009 at 8:23 pm

    let them try to use Allah or Muhammad as see how funny that would be. This is wrong.

  7. Jesus Wants to Be Your Friend - Windows 7 Center Forums says:
    August 13, 2009 at 8:10 am

    [...] Jesus has you covered Jesus Jeans deemed ‘Morally Offensive’ | Jeans Blog- Designer Jeans – Designer Jeans sales | Denim B… [...]

  8. HitMeWithIt says:
    August 13, 2009 at 10:32 am

    Oh come on. wrong?
    Here we go again with religion being given some special place of respect…for what?
    If it were Allah or any other imaginary god figure it would be exactly the same. they could have Santa Claus Jeans for all I care. no different.
    It is time that the world stopped giving religion a special ticket all the time.
    If they don’t like it, they don’t have to learn about it, read about it or, indeed, buy it!
    I don’t go into a church and then get annoyed at the rubbish they are spouting so why should it be different the other way around?
    I assume these jeans would be on sale. In a store. So, like the church analogy, if religious people are offended, do not go into that store!
    Offended when they see someone wearing the jeans?
    Get over it. Life does NOT revolve around you.
    I do the same when I see someone in the street spouting religion, wearing religious get up or just promoting religion.
    I just walk the other way.
    I get over it.
    I know the world is not there to please me and my beliefs so religion should be living by the same rules.
    Phew.
    I feel slightly better after that.
    :)

  9. I wish I had invented blue jeans | AloModa says:
    December 20, 2009 at 10:00 pm

    [...] pentru jeansi care-mi vine in minte cel mai des este: ‘He who loves me follows me’ (Jesus Jeans, o campanie din ‘73 marca Oliviero Toscani). [ Iertare ca scriu despre asta chiar acum [...]

  10. Dimitrios_M says:
    September 4, 2011 at 4:47 pm

    I’m willing to let the God-botherers win this one and save ammunition for something more meaningful, like same sex marriage, but I am truly curious to know why the trademark registration was rejected in China.

  11. Groovykarma says:
    September 19, 2011 at 6:52 pm

    The ‘Jesus Jeans’ first came out in the early 70s. NO one made a big deal about ‘Jesus Christ Superstar’; so why did they object so much to this designer who was way ahead of his time? How come no one every talks about the offensive stuff Donatella Versace did? The drugged out fashion shows? The cocaine flying around everywhere and the sex with anybody/everybody? She started the anorexia craze.
    How can an add be so offensive when Calvin Klein, basically, said the same thing without using the ‘Jesus Jeans’ label?

  12. Michelle says:
    November 9, 2012 at 8:21 pm

    Hey guys, What would you say if some of the money made from a product like Jesus Jeans was going to missions. To help feed and cloth people in Africa, Cambodia, India and Vietnam etc. I am not talking about Jeans such as that skanky picture I had just seen. I am talking about down to earth Denim Jeans.

  13. jm says:
    February 26, 2013 at 11:16 am

    I agree, if they had used allah or muhammed they would have major issues. Im appalled by the USPTO allowing this to begin with. Jesus is the most known name in the world, they are capitalizing and degrading our beliefs. Its like someone using your mom’s name on jeans and degrading her. This company will realize they will have to also face Jesus himself one day – wonder what they will say..

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Home   |   Jeans & More   |   Forums   |   Wiki   |   My Profile
About DenimBlog.com   |   Join the Community   |   Site Tour    |   Advertise © 2011   DenimBlog.com is powered by Huddler Fashion & Lifestyle    |   FAQ   |   Support   |   Privacy/TOS   |   Site Map